BillyCorgan.it Forum

Smashing Pumpkins: interviste

« Older   Newer »
  Share  
Cherub
view post Posted on 4/11/2007, 22:50




mah, i killers..
 
Top
view post Posted on 4/11/2007, 23:14
Avatar

Lascio che le cose mi portino altrove

Group:
White Spiders²
Posts:
21,963

Status:


ho appena letto lo spoiler di wazoo risalente al 27/09
si complimenti per il tempismo ma mi sto piegando in due dalle risate, sigh :'D
mitico
 
Top
TheGrandWazoo
icon13  view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 00:07




giuro che non ero fatto di lsd, sono fantasioso di natura uahwhahahaha !
 
Top
JamesEbow
view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 00:19




non mi stupisce il fatto che apprezzi i The Killers...
 
Top
.:adelaide:.
view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 01:48




beh billyl'ho sentito parlare male di altre band raramente (i memorabili bush e stone temple pilots).. i killers possono non paicere ma sono una band onesta, paghi e ti danno quello che ti aspetti live, soprattutto i live li fanno.. poi sono solo agli inizi, io li trovo un po' pallosi, ma non sono certo tra le band che eliminerei dalla faccia della terra..
comunque non mi preoccuperei di cosa ascolta.. visto che ascolta un mare di roba.. ricordate quando l'hanno avvistato a quel negozio di dischi e aveva comprato un sacco di dischi garage?
 
Top
TheGrandWazoo
view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 04:58




a che ci siamo, se a qualcuno puo' interessare, volevo provare a tradurre un passo importante di un intervista trovata sempre tra quelle pagine, dove i nostri eroi o presunti tali, discutono del loro rapporto con il nastro analogico, e' una traduzione ragionata abbastanza approssimata per quanto concerne gli intercalari Americani che non ricordo piu', ma vi assicuro che dal punto di vista tecnico sono abbastanza preciso, se avete la briga di controllare l'originale, magari aggiustiamo qualcosa ( tutte le note tra parentesi sono mie ) :

Quote from making-of-Zeitgeist DVD: “From another eon”
November 2nd, 2007 by jjb



Billy Corgan: La grande ironia lavorando con Kerry Brown ( che e' il marito di D'Arcy, batterista e tecnico audio per chi non lo sapesse ) e' che lui al momento possiede l'identico registratore in nastro analogico a 24 tracce che noi abbiamo utilizzato per registrare Mellon Collie. Quindi e' quasi come una bizzarro tipo di coincidenza il fatto che noi stiamo tornando a usare la stessa apparecchiatura con cui abbiamo messo su il nostro piu' grande album e noi abbiamo una specie di... Questo registratore a bobina e' finito per essere ( rappresentare ) una specie di porta fortuna cosi' noi al momento .... quando fummo allo studio , lo portammo con noi .Cosi' una fettina di Zeitgeist e' stata registrata sullo stesso registratore a bobina di Mellon Collie . Devo dire che e' veramente difficile registrare in analogico di questi tempi perche' quasi tutti gli studi di registrazione hanno adottato completamente i sistemi protools. I tecnici vedrebbero i registratori a nastro come se fossero dinosauri da altri eoni .

Jimmy Chamberlin: Ci sono cosi' tanti registratori a bobina abbandonati, lasciati li', sapete... Voglio dire, la gente usa il ProTools ( sistema di registrazione digitale che permette correzioni di esecuzioni incredibili rispetto al nastro ) quindi questa e' probabilmente una delle ultime macchine a nastro che viene utilizzata attualmente.

Billy:La maggior parte degli studi di registrazione non hanno piu' registratori a bobina addirittura e se ce li hanno, sono coperti dalla polvere e il tecnico che lavora li' che ha 22 anni, non sa' come usarla perche' conosce soltanto i sistemi protools. Quindi e' diventato molto difficile e proibitivo usare questo vecchio formato analogico.

Jimmy: Ogni registratore a nastro possiede il suo suono particolare e quella macchina di cui parlavamo prima ha quel tipo di suono scuro che troviamo in mellon collie, come quel suono di batteria molto secco o asciutto che potete ascoltare su quel disco.
SPOILER (click to view)
Il mio commento su tali affermazioni e' che fondamentalmente stanno un po' esagerando, negli ultimi anni c'e' stato un notevole incremento di ritorno all'analogico, e' vero che la maggior parte degli studi in europa e in america lavorano col protools, ma i big studios e alcuni piu' piccolini utilizzano sempre i due sistemi insieme come hanno fatto loro con mellon collie dove hanno usato anche protools..... farabutti !
 
Top
nikoz
view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 11:23




sì in effetti anche io ho pensato la stessa cosa.. molti artisti registrano solo in analogico..
 
Top
JamesEbow
view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 12:03




diciamo anche che per un grande gruppo come i Pumpkins non credo sia un grande problema registrare in analogico.... Può esserlo per un piccolo gruppo emergente, ma per loro non credo proprio.....
 
Top
TheGrandWazoo
view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 14:28




mi ricordo a fine 1999 suonavo la batteria da 3 mesi e stavamo facendo col gruppo delle registrazioni in analogico, ci hanno chiesto 200-300 milalire per la bobina ampex da un quarto di pollice, a Palermo ci sono almeno 4 o 5 studi che usano l'analogico , mi immagino a Roma, Napoli e nel resto dell'Italia dove sono strutturalmente piu' avanzati.
Per tale ragione secondo me i pumpkins sono affetti da sindrome da luogo comune visto che anche nel resto del mondo ci sono un infinita' di studi che utilizzano l'analogico a prezzi interessanti e in molti studi di questi ci sono stato fisicamente anche solo per visitarli.
Per un relativamente piccolo compendio tra l'analogico e il digitale, spacchettate lo spoiler come al solito


SPOILER (click to view)
Poi sono linee di pensiero, Frank Zappa abbandono' a un certo punto della sua carriera l'analogico perche' secondo lui troppo rumoroso ( e ci credo, con tutte le sovraincisioni di strumenti che faceva, si andavano a sommare tanti fruscii che neanche i sistemi dolby di riduzione del rumore riuscivano a ridurre del tutto ) , secondo me la maniera corretta per un buon suono finale e' quella di acquisire in nastro analogico e missare in digitale anche con protools , logic, nuendo , cubase , reaper o sonar.
quando comprate un cd, le tre lettere che vedete impresse sul supporto, indicano proprio questo, le tre fasi di realizzazione cioe' Acquisizione ( tramite microfoni e nastro o pc ) , Missaggio ( tramite mixer e nastro o tramite mixer e software o addirittura come in molti dischi recenti solo tramite software ) , e Mastering ( che non e' solo la riscrittura delle tracce audio su cd, vinile, cassetta etc, ma e' anche un ulteriore passaggio attraverso apparecchiature molto costose che trasformano il suono da rendimento 50 a rendimento 100 ) .
Quindi nell'ordine se in un disco trovate AAA, e' stato fatto tutto in analogico ( quindi un cd AAA non esiste perche' il cd e' un supporto dove il mastering riversa in digitale tramite una conversione detta appunto Conversione e scrittura Analogico/Digitale o A/D ) , esistono quindi prodotti AAA che sono vinili o audiocassette a nastro.

Nel caso invece di AAD avremo registrazioni e missaggio in analogico e riversamento durante il mastering in supporto digitale ( quindi cd, dat, minidisc o anche wav e mp3 ).
Molti cd cosi' suonano abbastanza bene devo dire.

In un supporto DDD il tutto e' stato mantenuto nel dominio digitale ( e occhio che esistono anche dei famosi registratori a nastro che sono digitali ) molti dischi metal per esempio necessitano di questi trattamenti . Qualcuno addita tali supporti come " freddi " , ma un buon tecnico di mastering sa' bene che basta riversare il prodotto digitale su un nastro a bobina analogico e poi riversarlo ulteriormente in digitale, per avere introdotto un certo " calore " , trucchi del mestiere....

 
Top
nikoz
view post Posted on 5/11/2007, 15:14




SPOILER (click to view)
ahh.. il codice spars.. e che tenerezza quei booklet anni 80 con le istruzioni per l'uso del compact disc.. in ogni promo che farò/faremo ho intenzione di inserire sempre entrambe le cose.. scusate ho finito.
 
Top
view post Posted on 22/11/2007, 10:31
Avatar

I can't go on digging roses from your grave...

Group:
White Spiders²
Posts:
5,930
Location:
Nowhere

Status:


Intervista a Ginger da bass player magazine:

Pumpkins Jam
Smashing Pumpkins' Ginger Reyes

By Brian Fox | September, 2007

When Billy Corgan sought to resurrect the Smashing Pumpkins to tour behind their new release, Zeitgeist [Martha’s Music/Reprise], he wasn’t necessarily looking to fill the shoes of previous bassists Melissa Auf der Maur and D’Arcy Wretzky with another female. “Billy told me that he actually didn’t want a girl for the gig,” says Ginger Reyes, the talented Los Angeles player who got the call. “But I think this band works best with a girl on bass. Billy is more open and sensitive than a lot of other men, and I think having a female presence onstage ties into that.” Coming off ten years with the all-girl pop-punk group Halo Friendlies, Reyes settled into her new gig as the Pumpkins bassist with a few months of rhythm-section rehearsals with Pumpkins drummer Jimmy Chamberlain.

How would you describe the bass lines Billy writes, and how do you go about playing them?
They’re creative and kind of melodically complicated—they rarely have the same run twice. And Billy likes to play all the way up and down the neck. My style isn’t exactly heavy-handed, but I definitely dig in hard with the pick, because the material is really heavy. On some of the newer songs, I play with my fingers. I tend to stay true to the recorded parts, but I definitely have the freedom to interpret. Some lend themselves to exploration and improvisation, but then there are the hit songs—I don’t want to mess with those.

Plus, Billy writes new songs all the time; he’ll just start playing one, and we’ll follow along. It’s great, because I’ve been able to come up with bass lines from what I hear and feel. We’re definitely always being creative—we’re not just out there playing the hits. So far on this tour, we’ve played four or five completely new songs.

Describe your playing connection with Jimmy Chamberlain.
I secretly want to be a drummer, so it’s been really cool to play with Jimmy, who’s amazing. Rhythmically, my style is very cohesive with his. He has an almost Latin feel—very soulful and bouncy. Since I grew up with Latin music, playing with him feels very natural. We’re pushing the rhythm, but not just by playing hard and driving it. I like to play tight with the drums, hitting the same accents.

The two of you rehearsed for a few months before the tour. What was that like?
We got together a few days a week—just the two of us, but sometimes also with Jeff Schroeder, our guitar player. All the time we spent playing together helped me understand Jimmy’s playing. I’ve started to get a sense of things like the fills he’d normally play. It also allowed me to get a good feel without relying on guitar or vocals.

Even on tour, we still have rehearsals during the day for a few hours. We jam a lot, which is great—nobody seems to want to jam anymore nowadays!

What does the gig mean to you personally?
Stepping into this band is like stepping into another league. Just a few months ago, I was hauling my own gear in the back of my truck. This tour is a little different, to say the least! Having a foundation in my faith helps me keep everything in perspective. I look at every day as a blessing, especially being a part of this band. That’s what keeps me going every day.
CAN BE HEARD ON

Smashing Pumpkins tour, plus her solo venture Ginger Sling, which has been featured on MTV reality shows The Real World, Pimp My Ride, and Laguna Beach.
CURRENTLY SPINNING

Sufjan Stevens, Illinoise [Asthmatic Kitty, 2005]
“I’ve gone back to my old Rush records, too.”
GEAR

Bass: Fender Custom Shop ’59 Precision Bass w/heavy-gauge Fender roundwounds
Rig: Tech 21 SansAmp RBI preamp; four Ampeg SVT-VR heads with Ampeg 8x10 cabs

By Diane Gershuny & Brian Fox
 
Web  Top
.:adelaide:.
view post Posted on 22/11/2007, 13:50




grazie irs!

mi sembra sempre più probabile che Ginger e Jeff saranno in studio per il prossimo album
 
Top
view post Posted on 22/11/2007, 14:38
Avatar

I can't go on digging roses from your grave...

Group:
White Spiders²
Posts:
5,930
Location:
Nowhere

Status:


Prego! Ho trovato anche questa, ma risale a un po' di tempo prima ^_^

Ginger Reyes
The new Smashing Pumpkin proves her mettle in the modern-rock boot camp

By Melissa Bobbitt
Published: August 29th, 2007 | 3:55pm

It’s 10 p.m., and Ginger Reyes is finally retreating to her Stockholm hotel room after a typically grueling eight-hour boot camp. It’s a routine fraught with unending tests of dexterity, stamina, speed, and teamwork that would break lesser women. But Reyes isn’t aiming to be the next G.I. Jane. She’s a Smashing Pumpkin, and her drill sergeant is the notoriously tough Billy Corgan.

Like a soldier marching into battle, the spry bassist is on a mission to win over the hearts and minds of Pumpkin purists who cried foul when it was revealed that the original members, D’Arcy and James Iha, would not be part of the reunion tour. D’Arcy departed in 1999, before the release of what was to be the final Smashing Pumpkins’ album, Machina/The Machines of God. Former Hole bassist Melissa Auf der Maur filled in during the band’s final year. Iha, who stuck by Corgan and drummer Jimmy Chamberlin’s side until the demise of the band in 2000, has said in a Rolling Stone interview that he hasn’t spoken to Corgan in years. Jeff Schroeder of the Lassie Foundation has since replaced him on guitar.

“The shoes I have to fill are really big, especially with D’Arcy, because she was a role model of mine,” Reyes says. “She was such a cool figure for a woman out there playing. I definitely am honored to be playing, not just in the band, but playing bass in the band after D’Arcy quit or didn’t want to be a part of it.”

Reyes says that ever since her initiation into Corgan’s club in November 2006, there’s been a veil of “crypticism,” as she puts it, blanketing her and Schroeder’s exact involvement in the band, as well as what prompted D’Arcy to leave. It’s a question rabid Pumpkin fans and Reyes are hungry to have answered.

“[Corgan’s] very cryptic in everything,” she says, giggling. “Sometimes I want clear answers, but that’s just not the way it works in this situation. I just don’t think there’s going to be that definite moment where he’s going to be like, ‘You will record on every record! You will be part of the band!’ I think it’s just the way he is.”

One thing is for certain: The Pumpkins’ 2007 album, the ferocious Zeitgeist, is proving its mettle among today’s multi-platinum pop stars and radio-ready faux rockers. Despite a seven-year hiatus, it landed at number two on the Billboard top 200 charts, and the Pumpkins have once again infiltrated the mainstream with appearances on The Late Show with David Letterman and weeklong stands at intimate clubs in Asheville, North Carolina, and San Francisco.

Playing, touring, and recording as a Pumpkin is a dizzying but enthralling experience for Reyes, though, unlike her heroine D’Arcy, she’s not new to the band experience. She has played bass in the bands Halo Friendlies and Lo Ball, and released two perky and pretty solo EPs under the moniker Ginger Sling, a project she’s since sidelined to aid Corgan and Chamberlin.

She’s also no stranger to performing in difficult situations. In her previous bands, she entertained troops abroad, proving that the power of music can heal and transcend partisanship. “I did USO tours to Bosnia and Kosovo. The first time I did that, in 2001, it was pretty much right after 9/11 and I went with Lo Ball. We went with a USO group to different military bases and performed for them,” she says. “The second time I went was about six months after that with the Halo Friendlies, we got to fly in a Blackhawk, which was pretty cool. Whatever your beliefs are with war and everything, it’s just really neat to see people who are dedicated to their countries.”

In 2006, Reyes ventured to Louisiana to help Hurricane Katrina victims and to Kenya to assist Mission to the World, a charity that works with families affected by AIDS. “I’ve always had this desire to help in some way. I’ve always had compassion for Africa and the situations that are occurring there,” she says. “It was touching to see just how much joy the children had, even though they didn’t have anything.”

As a philanthropic army of one, the bassist has scaled the walls of injustice and landed on shaky yet hopeful terrain. As a Pumpkin, Reyes says she’s been counting her blessings and loving every moment, no matter how demanding or cryptic her boss may be. She says it’s helped her grow as a musician, and more so, as a person.

“I am taking in a lot and I’m learning a lot. I’m learning so much musically and about people and myself — just to allow myself to not always criticize or stop the creative process. I see Billy do it all the time. He’s not afraid to start coming up with lyrics on the spot. He’s respecting himself enough to let himself go there, and I think, ‘Wow, I can let myself do that too. I can take myself seriously, basically, and not be so self-critical.’”
 
Web  Top
Cherub
view post Posted on 29/2/2008, 19:37




intervista rilasciata ai tizi di Guitar Center
CITAZIONE
Guitar Center met up with Billy Corgan and Jimmy Chamberlin at a hole-in-the-wall Chinese food joint in North Hollywood to talk about Smashing Pumpkins, Fresh Cuts Vol. 2, studio chops and how to make it big as a fresh, young band.

GC: You guys have seen some pretty dramatic shifts in the music business. What’s good and what’s bad about Smashing Pumpkins and the music business today?

Corgan: Well, I’d say the best thing is that we’re out of a label deal – totally free agents. We we’re just talking about how we’re going to start addressing our artistic relationships with the world in a different manner because we don’t have to go through some parental structure of “we don’t like it and it’s not going to sell” – you know? We’re excited about the prospects of sort of being our own business people in terms of how it interrelates business.

GC: Basically, you’re cutting out the middleman.

Corgan: And that’s the best part. I think in this world you don’t even need distribution. I mean, look, what’s great is, if you want to put out your shit for free on MySpace, you can. You don’t need anybody. You don’t need anybody inputting. And if it’s not MySpace, it would be somebody else, so.

GC: What insight can you offer a young act that needs to establish themselves without having the label marketing support, or having the knowledge of someone like yourself?

Corgan: Great music is still the best marketing. Word of mouth – I don’t care what peer-to-peer network you’re in, who’s distributing your stuff – word of mouth is still the ultimate thing. So at the end of the day, if you’re sitting on MySpace four hours a day adding friends, as opposed to four or more hours working on a song or getting your band to be really good, I still think you’re better off getting your band good. Practice.

GC: Guitar Center is giving away a free compilation CD in March with an exclusive Smashing Pumpkins track on it, Super Christ. It also features a lot of undiscovered acts that you guys helped select. How does a band like Smashing Pumpkins view this opportunity and how can this opportunity help up-and-coming bands?

Corgan: We see it as a great marketing opportunity for us. We’re about music and we’re about the more people hearing our music, the better. Plus it gives us a chance to hear some new stuff. We work so much and we’re so in our own little kind of self-contained world, we don’t get an opportunity to hear a lot of real underground stuff. For us it’s a cool opportunity to hear what’s going on in the non-mainstream, in the non-record label, big management world. Like, what are kids playing these days? Kids that work at Guitar Center, they’re that core of what it was like when we were kids.

Chamberlin: I mean, I didn’t work in a music store, but everybody I knew worked in a music store. We were dissecting records. We were really getting into it. And it’s like that’s where the music that Billy and I play today came from. It came from that completely obsessive nature, “What’s So-and-So playing? What kind of snare drum is he using? What kind of fuzz pedal?” It’s like those are the kids that, as adults, are going to make a difference someday because those are the people that are really into the nuts and bolts of making music. So that’s what’s exciting about it for us.

GC: Can you tell us a bit about the recording process for Super Christ? Where’d you track it, mix it, what gear was essential to producing it?

Corgan: We recorded it at Sunset Sound in Hollywood. There’re different rooms at Sunset Sound, but we worked in the one that Prince did Purple Rain in, on an old API board. We’d never recorded in there before. Drums sounded great in there, they’re really kind of dark but they got a lot of attack. Old basses. Actually, the bass I play on Super Christ, I bought at Guitar Center in Hollywood. It’s a ’58 Fender P-Bass.

GC: Did you guys write Super Christ during the Zeitgeist sessions or is it something that came after?

Corgan: We had the riff from the Zeitgeist sessions and we always knew that we wanted to do something with it, so once we got on tour we were like, okay, let’s go back to that.

GC: You guys have worked with many, many producers. How involved in the process of arrangements, tracking the song, producing, do you let someone come into your space to do that?

Corgan: Honestly, not so much anymore. And I don’t think it’s because we don’t want advice. We actually do want advice, but feel there are very few people that think about music the way we do. And I know that sounds incredibly pretentious, but we have a sort of philosophy. It’s like it’s asking them to think about it a totally different way, and most producers these days, honestly, they’re Pro Tools producers. They don’t think in terms of getting a great band performance or getting a great band sound. They think in terms of creating this massive wall of sound. Doesn’t matter that the band can’t play those parts.

GC: Can you tell us a little bit about recording with Roy Thomas Baker? Were there parts of the process where you felt like you were being schooled?

Corgan: Every day.

Chamberlin: Unbelievable.

Corgan: It’s like going to a recording master class.

Chamberlin: The first night he mic’ed up the drum kit, he had 414s over the toms, literally over the toms about this close, about a half-inch away from the drum head, with cotton balls taped to the top so there wouldn’t be any cymbal bleeds from the top. Just mics everywhere, and literally, I played for about five minutes, and when I went to listen to it, it was the loudest thing I’d ever heard in my entire life.

Corgan: For example, let’s say you had a bass guitar. If you don’t really need the rumble at 100 Hz and it’s going to get in the way of the kick drum, he just dumps it. And he dumps it in a way that you don’t hear that it’s been dumped, but he clears a lot more space. And his whole argument is, see I can turn the bass up louder and now there’s still room for the kick drum. Well, he does that to everything. He carves stuff out.

GC: You guys worked with Alan Moulder and Flood on Melancholy And The Infinite Sadness, two great producers, two different producers. But the record is totally cohesive, how was that achieved?

Corgan: Oh, yeah. Flood’s incredible. Flood is a tremendous producer. Flood is very masterful with the sonics, but where he really shines is he’s a great idea person. And I don’t mean like he tells you, “Oh, put this chorus here.” It’s more like he can see an ambiance of the song that you don’t necessarily see and he would really fight with us – not negative a fight, just he would really kind of push us to say there’s another vibe here that you can get to. And I think you can see that when he’s worked with U2 as well. He kind of pushed them to get to a little bit of a tougher vibe. I think a perfect example on Melancholy is a song called By Starlight, where the original version, the band sort of – rehearsal version was very ’70s. It sounded like a sort of a sad song from the ’70s. And he really pushed us to make it darker and prettier and more atmospheric and more kind of Depeche Mode and nighttime-ish. And when I look back now I really appreciate it. The song was the same. He didn’t change anything about the song. He really pushed us to a higher level with the way that we thought about our music and I think if you look at the changes in our music since Melancholy, he had a profound effect on the way that we think about music.

GC: How important is that type of experimentation for a younger band that maybe hasn’t had that opportunity to be educated by someone like Flood to say, hey, take a couple of steps back to really look at how you’ve constructed this song.

Corgan: I think it’s also the Pro Tools problem. And what I mean by that is, people fix the atmospheric or emotional problems in a song with production. Flood wouldn’t save the song with production. He would force us to save the song with our playing and then we would produce it. Essentially what I would say is if you don’t have the right emotional base in a song, you can never produce it right. And that’s what he really taught us, was spend the time getting that exact right feeling so that, even when you play it on acoustic guitar, that feeling comes through. Even when you play it heavy, that feeling comes through. Once you have that feeling in your body, then you know what to do. Then the production is easy. And a lot of times, if you look at the Beatles, it doesn’t take a lot sonically to produce an atmosphere. You can produce an atmosphere actually with very little instrumentation. It’s oftentimes the way you play and the voicing of the instrument that’s key.

 
Top
.:adelaide:.
view post Posted on 29/2/2008, 19:53




bella intervista, grazie per la segnalazione ^^

 
Top
423 replies since 27/9/2007, 10:42   10147 views
  Share